I watched yesterday a documentary on Discovery Knowledge about KV 63. The beauty of the findinds left me bewildered. The sarcophagus was incredibly beautiful, the face exumes a radiance not always matched in other sarcophagi. Unfortunately, at this stage, nothing has been recovered that gives us any clues to whom it may have belonged to. No other items recovered help us in any way.
However, the thing that annoyed me was the interview with Zahi Hawass. Mr Hawass affirms, just by looking at the sarcophagus, that the face reminds him of Tutankhamun's face on his sarcophagus (which is not even Tut's), so, it attributes the sarcophagus in KV 63 to Kiya which he calls mother of Tutankhamun and adds that Tut may have chosen to be buried in KV 62 so he could be beside his mother.
Now, this is science fiction!!!
There are no proofs that Kiya was Tut's mother, there are no proofs that KV63 belonged to her, there are no proofs that Kiya was buried in Kings Valley, there are no proofs that that sarcophagus belongs to her, we know KV62 was set in a hurry to contain King Tutankhamun's body...what is Zahi playing at?
Sensationalism? Publicity at every cost? Misleading?
It left a bad taste in my mouth....